Ask Lemmy

26707 readers

1410 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

140

Are there any occupations you uniquely oppose the existence of? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

179 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I did retirement home training and used to think it was a sweet job. Then I got in the business and underestimated how demoralizing it was as they give you the easy elders in training while the others make you, or at least me, really think of the fact the job just amounts to an unkarmic freebie.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well maybe braindead is still better than professional selfish corrupt assholes bending the system towards them across many decades.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The random dumb people would still be bribed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We had one guy (Ricky Muir) in Aus who kind of got in accidentally, due to a weird quirk of the voting system that has since been fixed. He was an uneducated bogan, who was mostly just interested in hotted up cars. But he actually took the position seriously and reached out to experts for advice on topics he didn't know much about. I didn't agree with his take on a few things (from memory, this was a decade or so ago, I'm an anti-car lefty), but he honestly seemed like he was doing a pretty good job. Way better than 90% of the rest of the more career politicians.

Most people aren't that dumb, given the resources...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

But at least wouldn't have decades to build up their networks.... But those may grow up regardless... Eh, no easy solutions.