this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
391 points (92.4% liked)
Games
32674 readers
703 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like I'm missing something completely - maybe I do need to learn how to read. The only thing I'm seeing on the jagex page is new prices for a handful of currencies under "pricing table", SEK is not one of them.
There's no mention of past prices at all? Is there another link I'm not seeing?
EDIT: I think my main point is that as far as I can tell, you need to be an active member of the RuneScape community to know what the prices actually increased from, so "learn to read" wasn't very helpful to casual passerbys, and OPs post could have some more clarity and examples of increased prices for those not already in the know. It was especially confusing that the only example they provided wasn't an example of the 50% increase mentioned in the title.
This is a general games community so I think it's fair to ask for some more context and leniency for such a niche game. If you want folks to care, don't make it hard for them to do so.
Read the Reddit posts.
Oh.
I don't think I care enough about drama in a niche game to do a deep dive on all of the reddit comments to learn about something....
It would be helpful if you or OP could provide links, or at least quote things. Most passerbys simply have better things to do than to find better context of what OP is saying about a game from 20 years ago. I think it's only natural for people to be confused when OP didn't provide enough context, or the only way to get context is to apparently read an entire Reddit threads worth of comments.
The price increase percentage is in the OP. Specific prices are in the linked Reddit post. The context was enough for everyone else.
"why can't you be like everyone else?"
Idk guess I just like to verify shit before picking up the pitchfork. My b.
Choose one. I told you where I found the specific prices. I mentioned which currency was particularly egregious so you could find the price yourself independently but you didn't care to.
I think a compelling statement should be made with citations if it's not a well known fact, especially when provided to a general community.
I don't care enough about niche old game drama to chase down the facts myself if it involves going through the comments of an entire Reddit mega thread.
Does that resolve your proposed cognitive dissonance?
The person gave you a percentage range of the increase and that it applies to different currencies. You have been given the opportunity to find more info if that's insufficient. If you don't care enough, that's on you. I don't play this game and don't care to read any more comments from you about this silly topic.
"Do your own research", a line associated with the great and credible orators of the internet.
You were given enough information about something you said you don't care about. I told you I don't care to read any more comments from you, yet you persist. Weird.
There were no citations to back up relatively unknown claims besides digging through the comments of a reddit mega thread.
If that counts as making a good argument to anyone, I envy their free time, or worry for their information hygiene.
Do you fancy yourself royalty dismissing their subjects? Lol. At once, my liege, I will be gone from your sight. Toodles!