this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
658 points (94.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5402 readers
3309 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Where did you find the specification of this one specific bollard and where is the furnace that it is supposed to protect? If there is nothing to protect, why should it be up to the same standard?

We can see that it is damaged, there is really no need to discuss it. It did not bend concrete but the steel tube. The concrete just snaps, it can't handle bending. It is just in there to prevent collapsing of the tube, so compression, which concrete can do really well.

There is also no other way for this to happen other than the bollard bending or a crane etc. dropping the car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sunken ones are the same and given such a dumb statement you clearly know you're wrong now but won't admit it.

The concrete is not there to prevent the tube from collapsing. You have that completely backwards.

It's clearly not bent. Get your eyes checked.