this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
659 points (96.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12491 readers
3398 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Both are correct. Language changes.

Do you say *newb when correcting people that spell it noob because the origin of the word is newbie?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

get on my level, i correct people when they say bird to let them know it's *bridd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Only when that flappy birb got them double d’s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It's "fappy" birb.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's different.

Anyone who says "sike" over "psych" is a sike-o, plain and simple.

No I will not elaborate further.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Whatever you say, Sithik!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

It's spelled n00b!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Both are correct. Language changes.

Does that mean that "there", "their", and "they're" can be used interchangeably now? Because that is much, much more common.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

No, because those all mean different things. Sike and psyche mean the same thing. Nobody needs to get pedantic about the correct spelling of slang used by elementary school kids in the 80's.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"language changes" does but make something magically correct.

It's not "pasgetti", it's "spaghetti".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It doesn't change magically. It changes through continuous usage and acceptance from society. That's how language works.

Some examples. When was the last time you heard somebody say something was "awful", as in awe inspiring? When a kid says literally, do you take them 100% seriously or do you accept that the word's changed to be a synonym for "figuratively" among younger people? And as far as spelling is concerned, colour and color are both correct spellings, depending on where you live. Gray vs grey, acknowledgment vs acknowledgement, same thing. Or look at barbecue vs barbeque; the latter was incorrect for a very long time until the popularization of the abbreviation BBQ, after which it became a commonly accepted variant.

These things were not always correct, and yet, now they are. Society adopts and uses different meanings and spellings for words all the time. Sorry friend, you're not the arbiter of English. It changes with or without you onboard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, but what we're talking about is far too new and infrequent for that to have happened yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Neither are you, friend. One webcomic does not change the language.

Enjoy your pasgetti with tomatoe sauce while you drink your expresso. Remember to enjoy it's flava.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It changes through continuous usage and acceptance from society.

"Clique popularity", then.

Point out the largest clique and see what they've done already. Witness your future to come. Hint: America's 'literally' and its dog-food spelling isn't the leader.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Hint: America’s ‘literally’ and its dog-food spelling isn’t the leader.

Okay? I'm talking about American English. Everybody's languages evolve differently based on their culture. I'm American, so American English is what I know best.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Both are correct. Language changes.

Apparently through popularity. It's like this need for evolution isn't checking for validity so much as "did the mean girls make a mistake that we should cover up?" .

The French have it right.