this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

World News

32297 readers
914 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

lmao, no it doesn’t. the US didn’t go to Afghanistan to eradicate opium. the US didn’t give a shit about it at all, lmao.

do tankies so blindly hate the US that they’ll give the Taliban a bj just to try to make the US look bad? wow...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War is a summary of the Washington Post's reporting on Afghanistan, specifically on the US government's own internal assessments from all levels of the military and political administration. In it, you'll find this quote:

Of all the failures in Afghanistan, the war on opium ranked among the most feckless. During two decades, the United States spent more than $9 billion on a dizzying array of programs to deter Afghanistan from supplying the world with heroin. None of the measures worked. In many cases, they made things worse.

The US doesn't need "tankies" or anyone else to make themselves look bad as far as the Afghan drug trade goes.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

lmao, so? we get it. you hate the US. what’s your point? just to come here and whine about it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ha you were conclusively proven wrong and didn't even blink. A brain so smooth no facts can get stuck on it.

spoilerPost another 🤓 "I was on the debate team" graphic, that's how discussions work

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ha you were conclusively proven wrong and didn’t even blink

oh, you mean here?

the US didn’t give a shit about it at all

ya got me there. they did care. still doesn’t prove that it’s why the US was there, and, in fact, several of the linked sources directly state to the contrary against claims that it was.

too bad it’s meaningless and - like always - you’re wrong. lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol so you initially ignore being wrong, then acknowledge you were wrong somewhere else, then say "well that was meaningless" when you go back to claim you were adult enough to say you missed on that one? ...What?

Go back to reddit if you're going to be a debatelord

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

wow, you moved those goalposts so fast and with such double-standards, I’m amazed you didn’t snap your own neck with those mental gymnastics. impressive!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit bingo card

wow, you are lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're the most reddit-logo person who has ever lived

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m unimpressed by your self-portrait

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This flew over your head but it is heavily implied that the US' "war on opium" was in fact a deliberate effort to subsidize opium production and transport, a policy that we have pursued for the benefit of our own state-backed terror organizations in many other countries. Regardless of all other opinions on the US and the Taliban, this is an issue that the Taliban is objectively better than us on, and saying "lol who cares" is not an argument against talking about it since obviously the people in this thread care because they're in here talking about it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This flew over your head but it is heavily implied

are logical fallacies all you guys know?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know we are leftists here. You can just say you are into your wife sleeping with other men. We respect a diversity of lifestyles. You don't have to do the whiskey overcompensation persona thing here. We can accept and respect who you are.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You know we are leftists here. You can just say you are into your wife sleeping with other men. We respect a diversity of lifestyles. You don’t have to do the whiskey overcompensation persona thing here. We can accept and respect who you are.

you have a talent for self-contradictory speech. the way you mix the word “respect” with overflowing disrespect, how you espouse leftism and diversity while speaking the sexism and misogyny of a fascist… it’s artful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lmao, so? we get it. you hate learning. what’s your point? just to come here and whine about it?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ve certainly learned a lot about hexbear trolls and what triggers them: getting called out as trolls and images of logical fallacies. just look at you!

👍

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

sorry you’re having such trouble. try