this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
177 points (94.9% liked)

Cool Guides

4561 readers
47 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Chinese? Japanese? Vietnamese? Hawaiian? Aboriginal Australian? Navajo?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Those are of different language trees and are unrelated, though some researchers have tried to claim that Chinese and other Asiatic languages share a common ancestor with these, it's not widely accepted and nearly impossible to prove.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Old World likely referring to Europe. Except they had to include Middle East and South Asia, because it's the same language tree.

Notably there's no Georgian, because it's also it's own language tree but is not in Europe. But the Caucasus is part of the old world. And Georgia is a candidate country for the EU.

You know what, it doesn't make sense either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

"Old world" because this is from a post-apocalyptic webcomic. It's taking place somewhere in Scandinavia.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

These are indo-european languages, I am sure you could do one for sino-tibetan if you feel like it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then where's Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam. Thought I'd see it around Sinhalese but they're missing. No south india representation :(

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're not missing, they just belong to an entirely different family. These are Dravidian languages, not Indo-European.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fascinating, and what about Basque?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Basque is a language isolate and is thought to be unrelated to the Indo-European languages in this graphic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Should be with the celtic languages I believe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

considering theres a small uralic bush the inconsistency is reasonable to point out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure but it also seems a bit, I dunno, silly. Sure, you could do a whole forest if you wanted to, and the name 'old world languages' is kinda dumb, as this is just two language families - but it's still a neat visualisation. It's not some conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

yea depending on how nitpicky you wanna get you can even point out that some language families are intercontinental between eurasia and the americas (not talking about colonialization, theres some related siberian and canadian languages iirc), but its pretty clear that this is supposed to be a general overview and pie languages do well enough for that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I would guess that none of those are "old world languages". Those would be on a completely separate tree.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Old world == afroeurasia