this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
43 points (93.9% liked)

Open Source

32317 readers
59 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've heard they tend to harbor a lot of alt-right types. Possibly because users can't really get banned. Is that true?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

We have a lot of projects like that. Too much for anything to go mainstream actually. We need to focus on one or a few so we have higher chance of popularizing it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Associating with crypto-fraud is a hard no for many users (I am referring to Nostro which was developed by a crypto-bro).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

i don't trust it because it is very big on the design meaning to be "censorship resistant" and there are certain kinds of posts that people make that probably should be censored, and while i like that some tools exist to make pseudononymous, censorship-resistant communications possible (tor and i2p are good. freenet is fine imho), this one looks like a grift that has a neon sign saying "censorship resistant".... and i am sure that associating with those people will lead to encountering some of that material that probably should be censored.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

the problem i see with nostr is that it implements a bunch of pro-cryptocurrency ideas: like paying to use relays for example and with all the sustainability issues regarding crypto and us wanting to create a better network, i would like to leave money out of it