this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
532 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3475 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
532
Developer posts secret key on GitHub, loses $40K in 2 minutes (cointelegraph.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Web3 developer Brian Guan lost $40,000 after accidentally posting his wallet's secret keys publicly on GitHub, with the funds being drained in just two minutes.
  • The crypto community's reactions were mixed, with some offering support and others mocking Guan's previous comments about developers using AI tools like ChatGPT for coding.
  • This incident highlights ongoing debates about security practices and the role of AI in software development within the crypto community.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

If there was any sort of password / highly entropic string detection in their build pipeline it would have caught a wallet's keys. They aren't an excuse for lack of diligence, but they should still be in every pipeline where passwords or keys might have to get used.

I'm terrible about building pipelines for most of my personal projects though, so I'm throwing rocks from my glass house here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

I like your CI plan but maybe they just needed some sort of sane policy. Like never commit plaintext keys to any repo. Never work with a $40k key in a new project under development. Never convert a private repo to public.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

A CI pipeline wouldn't fix this since the code would be committed before the pipelines run. This needs to be caught on the dev's machine with a pre-commit or pre-push hook.