this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)

Australia

3608 readers
180 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
48
Southern Hemisphere's first cryogenically frozen client at rest in regional New South Wales facility (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • In short: A cryonics company has frozen its first client in Australia in the hope of bringing him back to life in the future.
  • The client, a man in his 80s, died in Sydney before being frozen at minus 200 degrees Celsius at a Holbrook facility.
  • What's next? The cryonics facility is expecting higher demand as its membership base ages, although it's still unknown whether anyone preserved this way can ever be revived.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It would be a tremendously bad business move to choose not to revive them. They'd immediately lose all business as people obviously wouldn't trust their service anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Who would know? Everyone who knew them will be long dead by the time the question comes up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In the comment I was replying to, we are already in the future, already have the tech to revive them, and the company chooses not to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if a private foundation that was effectively an investment fund operated a facility that had been operating since the 1700s, keeping a handful of aristocrats and financiers in suspended animation, nominally at tremendous expense (hey, good alchemists and necromancers aren’t cheap). In reality, they cut a lot of corners and invested the change in building empires and buying yachts. Would anyone know or care? Would some millennial Hohenzollern or Rothschild really want to bring back their great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandpa back to show them the wonders of the modern world and ask them for their wisdom? And if it turned out that it wasn’t possible and the company said “please accept our deepest apologies, it looks like there was a failure of the undeath-support protocols some 130 years ago due to a human error. We’d fire the employee involved, but he’s long dead. Anyway, here’s $50,000 by way of apology”, that that wouldn’t settle it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Maybe it would, but it doesn't change anything. You asked why would they revive them, they would revive them to prove to potential customers that their service works and get more money. Yes they can just quit making more money like you described, but as I said, that seems like a stupid business decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

No corporation seems to give a shit about long-term viability when fucking over customers gets them short-term gains.