this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
93 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43731 readers
1030 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think dark matter is spot on. We're not finding it because it isn't a thing.

However... Relevant explanation of why people think there's dark matter.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Dark matter IS A THING. At least there is some thing out there that interacts weakly with the elctroweak force and interacts normally with gravity. We have plenty of evidence of it EXISTING. The problem of dark matter is we don't know what it is.... But sure as hell there is something. See the Bullet cluster if you don't believe me. And if you are a bit physics savvy, you can understand that it's evidence is imprinted in the CMB. We just don't know what it is.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The gravitational effect is the only prerequisite. The WIMP theory predicts weakly interacting dark matter but even primordial nucleosynthesis does not require weakly interacting, just that it be nonbaryonic. So only if WIMPs are right is it going to be weakly interacting.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well I'm not the one to argue with you but dark matter is only a thing because our current assumptions are a thing.

If we had to change our thinking because of new knowledge of some fundamental assumption (such as the reason for red shift), it could very well do away with dark matter. I'm sure such a change of thinking will seem as ridiculous to scientists today as heliocentrism seemed to astronomers of Galileo's day.

I'm not saying this is the answer, but it's an alternative view. Unproven, but then again we can't find any dark matter either.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It is just not one observation that the new assumption has to fit. There are multiple options that fit some but not others, dark matter fits most we just don't know what it's made up of.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, there may be an alternative answer. Just need to throw general relativity out of the window.

To be fair, future physics may indeed throw it away so there's that.