reddit_sux

You can say that if the voterbase is huge with multiple interest groups often at loggerheads to each other. But amongst people with predominantly similar interests such as in labour votes its is not that uncommon.

I gave an explanation for both the points talking less n anaesthesia from the point of view of preventing litigation.

New doctors are drilled by seniors n lawyers to speak less, be professional n only answer to the point.

OP's post was about anaesthesia.

it's about cramming as many patients as possible into each day.

Using general anaesthsia and controlling everything reduces risk as compared to doing it with local anaesthesia which might cause discomfort, vomiting. These can get you sued. You never know who will be the person who will screw you just because you tried to save a few bucks.

General anaesthsia might save a few minutes during the procedure but along with the time for giving anaesthsia, recovery from anaesthsia, after care. It is both more time consuming and costly.

being more personable and attentive would decrease the risk.

You would think so but in real world the more you speak more material you would give if you get sued. Hence the doctrine be professional and cover your ass.

I am sure US has stopped using Israeli tech, Saudi Oil money.

Arch Linux is the best for ur future projects in the morning but I am a bit of it and send it to be employed in his thoughts.

Everything depends on hardware.

I had the completely opposite experience of installing Ubuntu on HP laptop and giving it to my father. It connected without any problems to his work wifi while his friends brand new windows laptop couldn't.

Even I should get a pass to view copyrighted movies and songs. I need it to train AI (Actual Intelligence).

Both have proven track record of genocidal tendencies. Both are proven terrorists even if only one of them is a designated terrorist organisation.

So taking any statement made by any of them unverified with a boat load of salt is not only prudent it is necessary.

So is BRICS, so is OPEC.

INDIA is also in Quad, so even that is evil by ur definition.

Don't understand how joining an international group of countries is wrong.

If you mean to say that since Russia and China is part of the group making it the wrong group to be a part of. Then you must think even United nations is wrong.

What does AMD has to do with your privacy.