this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
1048 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
59217 readers
2773 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It already was prior to Musk's takeover.
It's just always been a cesspool. A complete waste of human energy and time. And it never once turned a profit. An abject failure by every metric.
It's crazy how media pretends Twitter wasn't the biggest contributor to Trump's MAGA movement, being the most followed user on the site up until his fanatic followers stormed the US capitol. I mean did people already forget these dreadful years of "Trump tweeted" headlines every single day??? Twitter has been an enemy to democracy for many years.
I don't know how you can say that was anti-democratic, though.
That level of open and direct communication from the sitting president is very democratic. Say what you will about the content of that communication, but Twitter did not act undemocratically by allowing the president to speak freely...
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
Also you could follow actual people like artists and niche hobby groups. It had a purpose. I mean, a passable one. Not anymore
'Undermining democracy' is still a purpose
He's absolutely fine with that. If anything, he represents the other side of tech billionaires, the illuminated technocrat. He thinks he's above the other social parts at a certain extent, so he's fine with anti-democracy arguments as long as they support his view of the world, including the idea that he's that saviour of us all, through technology, of course.