Technology

59068 readers

3471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

411

Meta spent $4.3 billion on its VR division in three months, and made checks figures $440 million in return (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so it sounds like you put a lot of value on a standalone experience. So something like a Switch or phone for gaming instead of a gaming PC.

That seems to be the area they win at. They don't have the best image, refresh rate, or tracking accuracy, but they are easy to get going with, and it's inexpensive relative to other options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

To me, the biggest strength is how small the headset is and the fact that you don't need to dedicate a room to VR with sensors.

I put a lot of value on how easy it is to setup. When VR first started, I had a dedicated 7x7 space with a pulley system so that the wires wouldn't get in the way. My computer had to be near as well.

If I had a mansion, I would definitely use a better headset, but if we want a better VR adoption, then it needs to be accessible to as many people as possible.