Technology

59378 readers

3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

946

Oregon governor signs nation’s first right-to-repair bill that bans parts pairing (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

100 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, they don't usually want to mess with odometers because of the liability. I think most manufacturers require that the cluster is sent to them in order to verify the correct mileage and then program a new one. There's aftermarket tools for doing it on some models, others you can just dump an eprom with a cheap programmer, it just depends really.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's ridiculous. Here's a decent way to do it:

Desolder the chip (or have a read-only port to plug into) and put it on a test board
Read the chip output and send it to the manufacturer (has mileage plus w/ cryptographic signature)
Manufacturer sends newly programmed chip to the mechanic, and the mechanic sends the old chip back in the provided packaging
Customer gets the car back, and the manufacturer can verify that the chip swap was legit

Boom, under a week turnaround without any backdoors in the odometer.