this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
239 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
3063 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Haha, definitely, it's infuriating and scary. But it also depends on what you are watching for. If you are watching TV, you do it for convenience or entertainment. LLMs have the potential to be much more than that, but unless a very open and accessible ecosystem is created for them, they are going to be whatever our tech overlords decide they want them to be in their boardrooms to milk us.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Well, if you read the article, you’ll see that’s exactly what is happening. Every company you can imagine is investing the GDP of smaller nations into AI. Google, Facebook, Microsoft. AI isn’t the future of humanity. It’s the future of capitalist interests. It’s the future of profit chasing. It’s the future of human misery. Tech companies have trampled all over human happiness and sanity to make a buck. And with the way surveillance capitalism is moving—facial recognition being integrated into insane places, like the M&M vending machine, the huge market for our most personal, revealing data—these could literally be two horsemen of the apocalypse.

Advancements in tech haven’t helped us as humans in while. But they sure did streamline profit centers. We have to wrest control of our future back from corporate America because this plutocracy driven by these people is very, very fucking dangerous.

AI is not the future for us. It’s the future for them. Our jobs getting “streamlined” will not mean the end of work and the rise of UBI. It will mean stronger, more invasive corporations wielding more power than ever while more and more people suffer, are cast out and told they’re just not working hard enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sony wants photographs of my ears for "360 reality audio". No. Just no.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Dude! I bought some Bose headphones that were amazing. But I read over the privacy policy and they wanted to “map my head movements” and they wanted permission to passively listen to audio sent through the speakers and any audio around the microphone.

I ran those fuckers back to the store as quickly as possible.

But not before having to duck and dodge agreeing to the privacy policy in their app, so I quickly deleted it. But when I started interacting with their customer service, they tried to get me to sign a different privacy policy that seemed formulated just for the information shared in the chat, but in two separate addenda I had to dig through, I saw they were tryin to get me to sign the original super invasive privacy policy.

Fuck Bose. Fuck all these fake fronts for surveillance capitalism. Fuck capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wrong chat dude. What does that have to do with AI anyways?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the claim is that they can use AI to improve the sound of their headphones if you supply them with images of your ears. I just dont like them having a database of personally identifying information like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How personally identifiable is your ear though? It's not connected to your thoughts, you can't use it to determine your age height and weight, which ad company would need that data? IMO, it's no different than sending a mold of your ear tube to a CIEM company to get your custom molded earphones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ears turn out to be a good way to recognize individuals. Ear biometrics is an evolving area.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594944/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I see. I still don't think it's cause for concern yet, but good to know. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Northrup Grumman probably already have a prototype to identify you by your ears from a mile up and kill you with a single bullet the moment you're not inside.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's bizarre without context, but i recognise what they mean - Sony's headphones app suggests you send them photos of your ears so they can analyse the shape to improve the noise cancellation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Which I don't think has anything to do with GenAI. Though, I admit I'm not well educated in ear scanning and 3D audio reconstruction, so good sources are appreciated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What worries me is how much of the AI criticism on Lemmy wants to make everything worse; not share the gains more equally. If that's what passes for left today, well...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I don't have a problem with machine learning. I have a problem with one company getting x trillion dollars investment. Who pays when the investors want their returns? Eventually it's going to be all of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't think they have that much potential. They are just uncontrollable, it's a neat trick but totally unreliable if there isn't a human in the loop. This approach is missing all the control systems we have in our brains.