Ask Lemmy

26903 readers

1551 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Neurotypicals, what do autistic people look like to you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12320962

Neurotypicals, what do autistic people look like to you?

Trying to get an idea of how NTs see us. I know that when I see autistic people, I see someone that's like me. Obviously, that's not how NTs perceive us, so what do we look like to yall??

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think they're generally considered high to low functioning autism, but it's the same idea as your terms, and I wouldn't get offended by them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

High/low functioning is also considered dated now too. The latest is level 1-3 based on amount of support needed:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Really? Wow, it's news to me. How long ago was this?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not positive but I believe it's only been in the last couple of years. Personally I feel like it isn't a particularly useful term update though because it is linked to perceived functionality anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I imagine that "high-functioning" and "low-functioning" are super easy to tie to one's usefulness in society, whereas support is more tied to an investment that has to be made into a person. The former says how valuable someone is and the latter doesn't.