Technology

59152 readers

2310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

488

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis (www.theverge.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis::Google says it’s aware of historically inaccurate results for its Gemini AI image generator, following criticism that it depicted historically white groups as people of color.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We can’t determine whether something is intelligent by looking at its mechanism, because we don’t know anything about the mechanism of intelligence.

I agree, and I formalize it like this:

Those who claim LLMs and AGI are distinct categories should present a text processing task, ie text input and text output, that an AGI can do but an LLM cannot.

So far I have not seen any reason not to consider these LLMs to be generally intelligent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Literally anything based on opinion or creating new info. An AI cannot produce a new argument. A human can.

It took me 2 seconds to think of something LLMs can't do that AGI could.