this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
48 points (83.3% liked)

World News

32077 readers
1110 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then source that. I gave you a source, the same website you used first, and it shows exactly what I said. Here it is again, just to be clear. Energy consumption is not the same as emissions.

You just keep going in circles here, and I've addressed this multiple times. Go back and read what I said. Nobody is saying energy consumption is same as emissions. I don't know why you keep bringing that up to be honest.

I’ve never argued Europe’s higher historic emissions, but no matter who has done more historically we still all need to stop producing so much pollution now. China emitting less historically will not save us if it produces more in future.

Sure, and as I keep pointing out. China has a clear plan that's being implemented ahead of schedule. Europe does not have such plan, and it does not want to work with China on implementing one. That's the real problem here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not seeing a source for "You’ve been continuously claiming that EU has per capita emissions on part with China. This is false."

I've sourced my argument, and it was a source that you brought up first. Your turn.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

My bad, you did talk about consumption based emissions. The point you keep avoiding is that China is currently implementing a tangible plan while Europe is not.