this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
48 points (83.3% liked)

World News

32077 readers
977 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm consistently impressed by Chinese timelines.

Every time I hear projections about America it's always "by 2030" or "by 2050" and shit like that - meanwhile, China is accomplishing more in less than half the time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Turns out that not selling your country out to powerful billionaires has its perks.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Less than it'll cost the US to put up a tenth of that 🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Does 1TW not sound as impressive as 1000GW?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

weird units, both of them. how many football fields is it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's about 69,420 London busses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How many dolphins end to end?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm all for solar & I'm planning on investing $10k in a small setup myself - but solar has some significant issues. solar panels generally dont get 100% of the advertised rate, are really only about 24% efficient with bleeding-edge tech, and degrade over time which requires constant upkeep in very large installations. they're also somewhat susceptible to environmental hazards like hail or sandstorms. additionally, you have to store the power somewhere so it can be used during the times it isnt sunny (generally more than 50% of any given day). battery tech has come a long, long way in recent years but we need long-term energy storage solutions that can be built at scale.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think you're misunderstanding to some degree. While silicon PV caps out at around 24% (I think up to 27% now), 100% conversion is basically impossible because of physics.

Plus, the sun basically has infinite energy, so it's not like efficiency is that big of a concern compared to energy density.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Solar isn't a solution for everything and that's precisely why China is pursuing a multi pronged approach for its transition off fossil fuels. China is actively developing wind power, geothermal, hydro, and nuclear on a massive scale. Each of these technologies has its own pros and cons, and they all work together.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's start using TW and TWh units then! https://g.co/bard/share/6726b69136a9

load more comments
view more: next ›