this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
41 points (82.5% liked)

Fediverse

28382 readers
697 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Defederation is cancer and it will kill Fediverse faster than any Meta.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Millions of Facebook users outnumbering previous users 100 to 1 will kill it. Oh, there'll be more activity than ever, but it will be a sanitised corporate safe space for advertisers, where millions of normies argue about politics, with misinformation and ads sprinkled throughout.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

That's called growth. Or do you want to keep Lemmy exclusive for marginals?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly cuz threads will lure a lot of people in the fediverse after the fediverse gets even more accessible and for all means more recognition than we can think about defederating threads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ability to choose with whom to federate with is a core concept of the Fediverse

If you don't want any defederation, join an instance that doesn't do it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, that's not a core concept of Fediverse, that's exactly the opposite. You want echo chambers? There are plenty of them already. It should be the user who decides what content to see and with which instances to interact, not instance admins.

Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites. That would be a death of the web.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites.

Imagine a worse, less fitting analogy

You can literally spin up your own instance in 20 minutes and see every instance ever if you'd like, it's a choice and its good to have

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

You can build your variant of Chrome yourself as well. Analogy is fitting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On the contrary, defederation is vital to the health of the network. Choosing which instances to not interact with, like far-right groups and hate speech groups, allows users to focus on reasonable content on their home server.

The instance should also be transparent on which instances they defederate with so occasionally the user can venture out into the wild west and see other instances and their points of view.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That causes fragmentation of the network, which in turn will kill Fedi over time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On the contrary: Advising popular instances to defederate with threads will actually help promote diversity of instances, since the Threads population is orders of magnitude a larger network than Mastodon. Having popular instances defederate with threads will keep lemmy from actually just merging into the threads network.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

No, as I explained in other comments.