this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
260 points (85.3% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
260
How a 27-Year-Old Codebreaker Busted the Myth of Bitcoin’s Anonymity (www.wired.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"This is the story of the revelation in late 2013 that Bitcoin was, in fact, the opposite of untraceable—that its blockchain would actually allow researchers, tech companies, and law enforcement to trace and identify users with even more transparency than the existing financial system."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

This has to be the most convoluted way of saying someone clustered wallet addresses of a public blockchain. I'm sure there's much more to her work, but this beats so much around the bush.... I'm not going to speculate on the author's motivations for this article, I'll just say I wouldn't waste (more) time on it.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The article’s point appears to be an ad for the book written by the same dude whose byline is on the article.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

that makes more sense, considering I felt like reading a darn book that never gets to the point

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

The article seemed to focus on the person more than the actual issues with blockchain.