this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
109 points (81.1% liked)

World News

32308 readers
844 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. and U.K. led a series of airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday evening, setting off alarms globally about how the attacks play into the smoldering regional risk of conflict — including a stream of questions from Congress about whether Biden was legally authorized to conduct the strikes at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What’s the argument that it’s a good idea? That congress is dysfunctional and can’t respond to urgent threats in a timely manner?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Basically, and that in the modern era where attacks can happen very quickly and with zero warning from non-state actors (as opposed to having to march an army across fields for days), the President needs to be able to react very quickly.

Given the current state of Congress, with a shutdown looming, no real plan, and apparently now some rumblings of a plan to oust the Speaker yet again, I can kinda understand the logic.

More cynically, it isolates Congress members from any political accountability.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I understand the logic in this case but I still think congress should have more oversight of US military force. If the entire body is too cumbersome to react quickly, surely a delegated committee could be formed that can approve or deny actions quickly. The danger of having that power unilaterally available to the president is too great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

For what it's worth, I don't really disagree.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

So they really said "Instead of making our congress functional again, we'll drop some of the oversights on warfare". Brilliant.