agitatedpotato

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He could have done what hes trying to do now three years ago. Why did he wait until there were LESS democrats in office before trying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh then it's okay he didn't even try anything until he realized he was so unpopular people are asking him to step down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Good thing money is free and not held in majority by a small group of people already politically co-ordinated to only allow two options to you for the sake of pretending the US isn't a one party state.

Also if it was all about fundraising, Bernie would have been president, but it isnt about fundraising, its about who's funding you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Who's trying to restrain the genocide? Last I checked Biden says nice things then does nothing but send more weapons?

Doesn’t matter, that option is not one of the two choices.

This is the cause of voter apathy btw, when you tell people there's no way to stop genocide, they're not going to feel like they can effect change. And when voter apathy sets in democrats lose. Democrats know this, yet pursue political avenues that foster voter apathy. I live in a blue state, nothing I can do will save the Democrats from themselves.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Hilarious when statistic are saying that of the voters getting apathetic they tend to be black and/or female. But stand on the name of those groups while you ignore how they're actually moving some more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Tell me what percentage of the country was able to cast a vote by march 12th, because it's not the majority. Most of us will never get a say before the primaries are over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

There's a difference between voting for an ideal candidate and not being able to vote for one materially supporting a genocide. "not funding genocide" isn't an ideal, it's a bare minimum. If not funding genocide is 'idealistic' to you, then I want no part of anything you're trying to sell and normalize.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fascism is the reason we don't like fascism.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

You see how that's a problem that the government cant agree on making things better for people but can agree on ban something millions enjoy so their donors can have more control over the data of that thing right?

Its not exactly a great example of democracy when we can't raise wages when the price of groceries is rapidly increasing but we can ban apps where kids make 15 second clips of them dancing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Almost like they use buzzwords to obfuscate the real meaning of the ideas that threaten their hold on power.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Only hearing from family when they deem it important enough to pick up a phone and call or text me directly is one of the benefits of not having social media presence with non any anonymous accounts for me.

 

Ahh the 67th Amendment

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Every Russian think they're gangster until the snow starts speaking Finnish.

 
view more: next ›