this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1099 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
59217 readers
2607 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Are we talking about the internet? I honestly feel the internet is just too wild for children. I'd even create legislation for phones and computers to have mandatory internet security features for minors. I grew up looking at things like Rotten and Liveleaks with friends at school. Without noticing, watching people die in gory ways was my main internet activity at 15, and it was pretty hard to stop that habit. I wish I didn't have access to that content at that age, I was pretty fucked up for a couple of years. I was totally desensitized and didn't care when a family member died, didn't feel a thing. I knew it was wrong, I just couldn't feel anything.
Yes.
A bunch of states including NC are just blocking porn to protect the children but it's literally the laziest solution with some of the smallest impact.
Twitch, Discord, and Roblox are far more accessible and arguably more dangerous in terms of short term consequences than porn because they are primarily social interaction platforms.
I've never seen Rotten or Liveleaks (at first I thought you meant Rotten Tomatoes that's how unaware I am), but they could probably use similar regulation.
It's not even that I think porn regulation is inherently bad, but the implementation is garbage and the claim to protect the children is extremely weak.
Social content sites are dangerous because of the opportunity for predators to easily encounter minors (especially age restriction breaking ones under 13), and violent content sites are, well, violent? They should be a higher priority but they evidently aren't.
Yeha, I'm not defending the implementation but the idea. I think children shouldn't be exposed to certain things. The reality is that the internet is flooded with porn and it's basically impossible to achieve, but maybe this is just the beginning of something more organized.
As much as I would like to believe that, these politicians have more than demonstrated their intentions and modus operandi. They need to be voted out and replaced with someone who will actually try to do the right thing even if it's not such an easy talking point come reelection time.