zhunk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Coffee is only a few bucks at a coffee shop, a few cents at home, and free at work. Now, getting some daily overcomplicated concoction, on the other hand...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What is Russia's motivation for confirming this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Is the downside that quote posts make it easier for people to dog pile? That seems like it should be less of an issue because of defederating instances with that proclivity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So does Valve?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I was kind of hoping for Impulse Space, but they're probably too unproven.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

One of Starship's engines on the lowest setting would tear the station apart. Regardless of whether they make this based on Starship instead of something more reasonably sized like a Dragon or Falcon 2nd stage, it'll still need either a new engine design or a big cluster of Dracos. It'll be something custom.

Regarding their Artemis work- the payments are milestone based, so they get money as they pass milestones. Engine relights and ship to ship prop transfer are some of the next ones.

Regarding their other customers- the Starship manifest includes another moon cruise, several satellite launches, and a lot of Starlinks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Serious answer- SpaceX is building the deorbit vehicle then turning it over to NASA, who will have full control over it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

There's no way Russia builds a new station. The timeline for them getting Nauka to orbit basically proves that it's impossible. They've been trying to buddy up with China to visit theirs, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I'm just waiting for the moisture farmers to get landspeeders

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The docking adapters look pretty much the same (interlocking petals, not male/female) and can be active, passive, or both, but Dragon's is only active. Active has to dock to passive, so two Dragons couldn't dock.

SpaceX developed a new one that can be active or passive for Starship, which will have to dock with Orion and the Lunar Gateway.

https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/nasa-spacex-test-starship-lunar-lander-docking-system/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe? Soyuz is too cramped, but Dragon might be able to fit extra people. A few years ago a NASA astronaut flew up on a leaky Soyuz, so they looked at using Dragon as a lifeboat:

https://www.space.com/nasa-spacex-dragon-rescue-spacecraft-soyuz-leak

Dragon was drawn up to fit 7 people, with 3 seats on the bottom and 4 on top. They ended up changing the seat angles for reentry, so now they only have 4.

--

Starliner is still their emergency ride home in case a real alarm goes off, but they want to study the leak issue as much as possible before they separate their service module, which burns up during reentry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Realistically, there's a SpaceX Dragon docked to the ISS, so that's probably their emergency shelter and ride home.

view more: next ›