zbyte64
Such a standard would require every response to include a whole historical account.
I wrote:
Maybe you are under informed. The Abraham Accords and the moving of the US embassy were escalations in this conflict.
Are you seriously claiming I said Trump started the conflict? What does the word "escalation" mean to you?
Me: post factual events
You:
Wait, so you’re saying that US culpability in this conflict starts, and ends, with the Trump administration…?
Me: Who are you arguing with here? It isn't me.
…what? You just said Abraham accords are the reason for this conflict…
I said they were escalations in the conflict
Maybe you are under informed. The Abraham Accords and the moving of the US embassy were escalations in this conflict.
You're holding it wrong
Doesn't that explain what our parties have to offer though?
Yes the Dems need to win but you're giving them too much credit. We don't need to make them sound competent with "they're threading the needle", because they aren't. Doing that will give people a false sense of security that there are adults in the room. At best, the voters are the adults, not the Dems.
They're giving up control by exercising control?
I wish we'd yell at the non-voters at least as equally as the 3rd party voters.