this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
77 points (96.4% liked)

politics

23023 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Experts warn that online extremism and US political polarization are fueling radicalization, creating a “perfect storm” for attacks like the ISIS-inspired New Orleans incident.

Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a veteran who killed 14 people, followed a pattern of lone-actor radicalization linked to personal grievances.

While the majority of radicalized individuals will not commit acts of terror, the rise in Islamist extremism and the increasing diversity of ideologies pose significant challenges.

The FBI has ramped up efforts to combat domestic terrorism, but the threat remains, with concerns about potential attacks from both the far-right and anti-Trump ideologies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I am so fucking sick of media's knee jerk reaction to both-sides this shit. It's all right wing reactionaries, be they Muslim, Christian, Atheist, or other. The problem is right wing extremism, not political polarization.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am so fucking sick of media’s knee jerk reaction to both-sides this shit. It’s all right wing reactionaries, be they Muslim, Christian, Atheist, or other. The problem is right wing extremism, not political polarization.

Because:

  • The mainstream media wants viewers from "both sides" in order to maximize viewership and revenue. So they feel they have to "both sides" every issue in order to not piss off half of their viewing base with every news segment.
  • The mainstream media is gripped with fear that if they acknowledge that one side has a point, they will be perceived as "biased". Which again leads them "both sides" ing an issue to try to not piss off their customers or draw the ire of the other side.

And now we can add this to that list:

  • Trump has openly committed to using the power of the US government to retaliate against those who report on him unfavorably, and has already shown his willingness and ability to follow through. The most notable example is getting ABC to cough up $15 million and apologize to Trump simply because George Stephanopoulos repeated a judge's proclamation that what Trump did met the common definition of rape. Jeff Bezos refused to endorse Harris in order to avoid Trump's ire. Mika and Joe Scarborough made the Mar-a-Lago pilgrimage in order to avoid Trump's wrath.

Heck, "Both sides" ing the issue is probably the best we're gonig to get now. We've already seen coverage at mainstream sites like CNN and MSNBC shift much more favorably towards Trump. Look at what Trump forced ABC to do. I would not be surprised to see a shift in tone where "both sides" isn't enough any more, and open praise of Trump and criticism of his critics becomes the only way to avoid Trump's wrath, a-la North Korea state media.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't really disagree except that I think it's a mix of not wanting to appear biased and actually being biased. The mainstream media establishment actually views left wing "extremists" as more threatening than right wing extremists. The right doesn't challenge power, and the left does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Last decade we would say facts have a liberal bias. Now I would say context has that bias as well.