witx

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Their whole aesthetics is super cringe

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

It's called Dune

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Meh I dislike Musk as well but I don't let that cloud my judgement of his companies or science/engineering in general.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Right because innovation materializes itself when we want ... We just flicked our fingers and airplane, cellphone and others just appeared.

Who are you to tell what we should or should not pursue?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Isn't there space for both? Why not try multiple avenues? Why have this negative view on everything? Wouldn't you say the airplane and the car have tremendously improved humanity, even with all its downsides? Or the cellphone?

I bet at the time of their inventions you would be opposing it because "billionaires are bad and this industry is going to explore the working class". Guess what? Yes billionaires are bad and explore people and you (all of us) should be fighting against that, not against scientific and engineering inovation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (27 children)

You seem to be letting your hatred for Musk confuse you about space exploration. NASA and other governmental agencies do very important work when it comes to space exploration

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (47 children)

Is this sub-populated mostly by Facebook people? Some of the answers really feel like it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This is the "you're more productive at the office" crowd

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

What you're asking is akin to: why are people impressed by the airplane? We've already reached the Americas and India by boat.

SpaceX, and others actually are not advancing science per se, but are greatly improving/optimising the engineering so that it can be used in cheaper ways by others.

There's also the issue that after the moon landing we didn't really improve that much and much of the knowledge faded

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You cherry picked his argument and left out the rest where he states China's as cheaper standards of environmental "friendliness"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're so kwel and super smart, little guy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
  • You will spend your entire career chasing trends.

Depends on the language, that's mostly a JavaScript/typescript issue.

  • The market is volatile. People are constantly getting abruptly laid off. SD has never been very stable, so you should plan on getting a new job every few years.

Depends on the country, where I'm from there has been very few layoffs.

  • Software companies are constantly looking for ways to make SD easier. As a result, your value will decrease over time, in preference for bootcampers and 2 year degree graduates.

Not sure what to say, I haven't felt my value decrease. All I see are bubbles saying they will replace me.. and then they burst.

Nobody listens to developers. Your manager's beliefs about SD come entirely from consultants, magazines, and Elon Musk tweets.

Agree but that's more of an engineering wide problem, specially when you get managers with very few engineering experience. Take the Apollo landings as an opposite example: great managers that were great engineers.

  • Nobody cares about quality software. If you take the time to make your code efficient and lightweight, all your manager sees is you taking longer to make something than your peers. After all, we can just raise hardware requirements if the software is slow.

This is a bit too generic to argue against. You can get that in electrical engineering no? If you take more time designing that PCB because you want to better place the components to improve heat dissipation, will your manager care in the end?

 

Hi, how do you run forgejo under a reverse proxy while using an ssh channel to pull/push commits?

From what I understand caddy is only able to proxy http traffic.

 

Hi there,

What SFF machines do you recommend for a server to basically run opnsense (with a 4 port expansion NIC) and a bunch of extra disks to serve as a NAS? I was looking through Thinkcentre m720, m800 et al. I believe these allow for up to 3 disks

I know usually you'd run opnsense on a dedicated machine, but I'm a bit constrained on space so am trying to fit all in one. I don't want to stream Linux ISOs on this NAS just to store my own files.

10
Tailscale and two NICs (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi all,

Anyone with a similar setup to this:

I have a machine with 2 NICs one for default gateway and other a "private" subnet with a service I need to access remotely for a few days (basically its a wifi router where a wifi-only device connects).

Will tailscale work for this case plug'n'play or will I need setup any routing?

 

Hi,

I believe with just one port for opnsense (on a min-pc) we can still do vlans (with tagging I believe?) but how effective is that for segregating and isolating proxmox machines?

Say I want to keep a VPN machine isolated, from other virtual machines? How would you do that? Do you have any tips for running such a system?

view more: next ›