Mystery flavor obviously.
What could possibly go wrong?
webghost0101
joined 1 year ago
I agree i should have used different words, scam-ableism is counter productive to educate about traps.
I am pretty sure my dad fell for one of these because an ad popt up trying to pay a digital parking meter.
Though he wasn’t trying to get access to illegal content what people behind this campaign are alluding towards.
Scams come in so many shapes and forms, there is accidental click and there is “looked like an official Netflix page”. How many people will knowingly pay for something they know is available for free?
I went to their website just to have a laugh. This is some real shizo propaganda.
You could replace all of it with: Only watch self sourced pirated media! Paying and relying on any service has inherent risks
“1 in 3 (32%) people who illegally stream in the UK say they, or someone they know, have been a victim of fraud, scams, or identity theft as a result.”
320/1000 people know someone unlucky enough to fall for a scam.
This risk increases significantly when users exchange credit or debit card information to view content on unregulated and illicit websites.
If you pay for your pirated content you are doing it wrong.
Watching content via an illicit source can expose younger viewers to age-inappropriate content. These unauthorised websites, devices, apps, add-ons, and the content they can access have no parental controls.
My kids get a tablet exclusively pointing to a private media server in order to obtain the parental controls for-profit services just don’t provide. I banned YouTube kids, it was a shitfest.
That requires knowing the names of the pages i need which is practically never the case.
If i have plenty of time to do a deepdive sure but here i wanted a quick fact of the day kinda thing.
You have no right to call me out like that.
Using 2 different versions of a technology for different usecase?
I do have a custom instruction to use Wikipedia as a source where possible.
The difference is i dont need to know what i am looking for i can just ask some a basic question.
Llms are limited and for that reason vey hated on lemmy but they can be very useful when configured right.
My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.
I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia
It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
Oh yeah, and i really miss sonet.
I am on a 1 month break back to chatgpt and honestly it sucks, claude is way better.
The pattern/struggle predates llm though and I don’t have one to use in the middle of live interaction.
I had huge age of empire nostalgia vibes,
My friend had the same feeling but age of mythology instead.
Neither of us played the “other” game but we both agreed the sound design in 0ad was almost identical to our different memories.
They are top down strategy games so i sort of gave it this umbrella term. “Age of … “ strategy games
If you zoom in really hard into how “electricity” works you find it mostly has to do with electromagnetic fields.
If you zoom in on electromagnetic fields you get quantum mechanics.
If you zoom in on quantum mechanics you find a lot of disagreement, basically the best scientists today still don’t fully understand our observations.
So in essence we still don't really understand electricity.
At best you get physics that describes phenomena like vanderwaals forces describes the magnet force but they don’t explain how to phenomena exist, how those forces form.
Or i am just to stupid to understand the current scientific meta. I have always been dissatisfied with how unrevealing physics was and how much questions it never answered while getting a passing grade though.