theoretiker

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except of you are doing research you'd need to write hundreds of emails asking for a paper, just to then find out that it doesn't contain the specific piece of information you are looking for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah that's really cool. So maybe similar to how turbulence can form at one point while the preceding flow remains laminar?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But you didn't choose to have the thought did you?

Quick think of a city and then explain to me why you didn't pick Cairo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I want to rebuke you but you name is even more triggering. There is no linear chaos, you need non-linearities or discontinuities for chaos.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Not executing it would also be predetermined. The only thing you can do is pretend to choose.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Neurotypical exists. Neurodivergent is the more "leftist" or scientific term for what they mean.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Where did that money go? Now it's just in the hands of some other rich dickheads.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But then there are the dicks that we don't get to see because they would confuse and distract the audience (Willem Dafoe apparently)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a stupid piece. You don't need anything quantum to recognize optical illusions. An optical illusion as they talk about it means that an image could be recognized as two things. This can be done by just adding some noise to the image. Sometimes it gets recognized as one thing and sometimes like another, just like humans would.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's a huge claim. Do you by any chance have a review paper on that? I'd guess that if that's the case there should be plenty of anthropological evidence that early hunter gatherer tribes were hierarchical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't necessarily disagree, but I need clarification how capitalism is inherently hierarchical. I know that for example starting from a state where everybody has the same "capital" things tend be be distributed unequally because more capital grows at a larger rate than less capital. But this is more something that emerges from capitalism rather than an inherent property.

view more: next ›