theluckyone

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You state that animals are expressing wants and needs, not emotions, then ask questions that can only be answered by "we don't know".

I'd sooner think you do not know the former, either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

When the farmer says: "I'm here, ain't I?"...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

After reading through your post history, all I can say is "Bullshit."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It has everything to do with him being a hypocrite.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What possible reason would literally millions of people have for disliking Elon?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Elon has been doing a fine job at burning his own reputation down. He certainly doesn't need any help from the rest of us in doing so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's what she said.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But the people putting the wheel, lever, and fire together are really going places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Quote by the OP, emphasis mine: "Your body probably will go full panic mode and store back as much as possible as soon as you starts [sic] to eat normally again. I'd advice agains [sic] doing anything so violent, and just lower your food intake to a bit under normal."

After which you attack the OP for violating the laws of physics. The OP didn't attack CICO, promote bunk science, or deny climate. Neither am I.

You've got the personality of dog shit and an equivalent reading comprehension. Quit gaslighting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No, we're not discussing CICO. We're discussing your inability to recognize that the OP used the phrase "eating normally" to describe dieters returning to their normal eating habits (ie, how they ate prior to dieting), and your resulting attack on the OP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Normal for them, not your normal. Nobody asked you for your personal definition of normal. Again, reading comprehension. Get some.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

You really need to work on that reading comprehension. Valmond stated that people will regain weight when they return to eating normally after dieting.

You claim that's not how physics work, then move the goal posts stating "if people only eat what they need, they won't gain the weight back." Well no shit Sherlock, but they're not eating normally. They're gaining the weight back if they go back to eating normally.

Quit being so quick to attack folk and read the fucking post.

view more: next ›