serpentofnumbers

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You are not wrong. There seems to be a similar level of responses too.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (12 children)

how could someone view this as anything other than dystopian?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because of the nature of time, the universe is in a constant state of becoming something else. Everything is changing all the time. But, because of the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Mass, there is always part of what was before persisting in what is now. For example, a fire burns logs, releasing the kinetic energy as heat, water vapor, carbon dioxide, etc. The heat dissipates because the atmosphere is very large, but it doesn't dissappear, it just gets diluted. The water vapor is released into the atmosphere, and those molecules become moisture in a cloud and turn into rain, continuing in the water cycle. In a metaphorical sense, your past selves have "burned" and "released" what you are now. You may consider your past selves dead, but the molecules that made them continue to exist as your current self, even if those molecules are rearranged or are slightly different (we eat food and excrete waste, so our molecules are regularly being exchanged with other molecules in the environment). Those same molecules were once inside the sun. Before that, those molecules existed at the beginning of the universe. So, in a way, yes we are constantly dying and being transformed, but the stuff that we are made of can never die. We are just constantly changing, along with the universe, because we are part of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Zardoz Clause!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you sure this isn't just a picture of Captain Jonathan Archer?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Basil Hayden, Woodford Reserve, Knob Creek, Angel's Envy, Old Grandad, Bulleit are all great choices.

Basil Hayden or Woodford would definitely be my first choice though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

ah, the "Shane Gillis" approach

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if this counts as brutalist, but the post made me think of this example from Portland

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

"ghosts aren't real"

"well of course, but they don't know that"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago
view more: next ›