Please don't. If you need something like json but with comments, then use YAML or TOML. Those formats are designed to be human-readable by default, json is better suited for interchanging information between different pieces of software. And if you really need comments inside JSON, then find a parser that supports // or /* */ syntax.
Never knew that ddg had an LLM, will check it out. Thanks!
zipped xml!
I’m sorry which LLM is this?
It's perplexity.ai. I like it because it doesn't require an account and because it can search the internet. It's like microsoft's bing but slightly less cringe.
How’d you get that out of it?
The screenshot is fake. I used Inspect Element.
I don't mind people making and sharing AI pictures for fun, but if you sell those pictures, that's kinda cringe tbh.
I actually do have glasses, I just never bothered learning about any of the technical details behind my lenses. Optometrist measured my eyes, I chose the cheapest frame the store offered, came back a week later to pick up the glasses and that's about it.
yes, it's that.
This post reminds me of those "attack helicopter" jokes from 2016, except this time it's actually funny and not hurtful
It's true what you say about volatility. It's not just the internet, it's everything digital, even offline storage.
A few months ago I was about to sell/give away a bunch of old childrens books that I had, my reasoning being that I will never want to read them again, and even if did want to for whatever reason, I could always find ebook versions of them.
Ultimately I decided to keep the books -- what if, sometime in the future, I wanted to share these books with my (potential) children? Would all of these books have been preserved in digital form? Would I rather be giving my children a physical copy that I owned and read personally, or emailing a PDF? Physical media holds real value.
I've seen some niche bands release (free) official torrents of their music on a certain piracy website. It's kind of surreal. Just goes to show that piracy is and always has been about sharing culture
I recently wanted to run tegaki, and my experience is pretty much summed up by the meme. I consider myself fairly tech-savvy, but I just couldn't figure out how to compile it. So I just gave up, downloaded the .exe and put it into a fresh wine prefix. After installing CJK fonts, everything ran fine. Now I'm trying to get gpaint to work. ~~My distro recently dropped support for gtk+2 (which I am fairly pissed about, since it's the last good version of GTK+), so I have to set that up manually as well.~~ [[[ EDIT: gtk2 is alive and well. I was just being and idiot and searching for gtk2, when the package is actually called gtk+2. ]]] I installed all of the dependencies that ./configure told me to, but I still kept getting obscure errors when running make.
So, here's my question: what tools make the process of running abandonware easier? Docker containers? Also, what can I use to package abandonware in order to make it easy for other people to run? Flatpak? Appimages? Any advice is appreciated!
Also, inb4 "just find a modern alternative". That would be a reasonable solution. I don't want reasonable solutions!
Context: Even though Chromium has native support for AVIF, a very nice image format, Microsoft goes out of their way to remove it from Edge, which is a chromium fork. Jpeg XL (JXL) (not to be confused with Jpeg (JPG) or Jpeg 2000 (jpg2k) ) is another nice image format, which, IIRC, is only supported in Firefox.
Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqhPUmyrfGI
Without ads/tracking: https://www.yewtu.be/watch?v=fqhPUmyrfGI
/*
* This DOT code is provided under the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license.
* For details, see: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
*/
digraph cooking_stick {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box]
node [width=1.0]
here [shape=diamond label="start\nhere"]
nonstick [label="non-stick"]
nonspray [label="non-spray"]
noncooking [label="non-cooking"]
nt_cooking [label="cooking"]
nt_spray [label="spray"]
ns_cooking [label="cooking"]
ns_stick [label="stick"]
nc_spray [label="spray"]
nc_stick [label="stick"]
nt_c_s [label="spray"]
nt_s_c [label="cooking"]
ns_c_t [label="stick"]
ns_t_c [label="cooking"]
nc_s_t [label="stick"]
nc_t_s [label="spray"]
node [width=1.6 height=1.5 fixedsize=true]
nt_c_s_i [label="" image="nt_c_s.jpg"]
nt_s_c_i [label="" image="nt_s_c.jpg"]
ns_c_t_i [label="" image="ns_c_t.jpg"]
ns_t_c_i [label="" image="ns_t_c.jpg"]
nc_t_s_i [label="" image="nc_t_s.jpg"]
nc_s_t_i [label="" image="nc_s_t.jpg"]
splines=curved
here -> nonstick
here -> noncooking
here -> nonspray
nonstick -> nt_cooking
nonstick -> nt_spray
nonspray -> ns_cooking
nonspray -> ns_stick
noncooking -> nc_spray
noncooking -> nc_stick
nt_cooking -> nt_c_s
nt_spray -> nt_s_c
ns_cooking -> ns_c_t
ns_stick -> ns_t_c
nc_stick -> nc_t_s
nc_spray -> nc_s_t
nt_c_s -> nt_c_s_i
nt_s_c -> nt_s_c_i
ns_c_t -> ns_c_t_i
ns_t_c -> ns_t_c_i
nc_t_s -> nc_t_s_i
nc_s_t -> nc_s_t_i
}
Do these things correlate that much tho? Not to toot my own horn, but I am fairly tech-proficient and have terrible typing skills. My technique is somewhere in between hunt-and-peck and touch-typing, despite regular typing lessons in elementary school. I imagine a lot of other people are like this, and vice-versa as well.