owsei

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Punk rock for kids who can't skate, by destructo disk

and The power of positive drinking, by ashtrays

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Tbh you can play 0h h1 on your phone. A simple level takes 30 some seconds

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Do you have feet and a camera?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

HOUSE OF LEEEEEEAAAVEEESSSS

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

games, specifically far cry 2, 3 & 4 and overwatch. And punk shows, getting beaten up in a mosh while very drunk is truly refreshing/entertaining

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every decision is arbitrary in some way. We, as humans, defined it would be better to arrange the periodic table a certain way, based on characteristics of the elements, but the characteristics chosen are arbitrary. We could've just chosen a different set for ordering, like alphabetical.

Tho, that's a correct (IIRC) yet weird usage of "arbitrary", and since language exists to talk, not to be correct, we might as well not use this definition of arbitrary and stick to what conveys information better.

Edit: I'm wrong! perhaps "correct" was the word I meant to say, not sure tho.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I disagree with you, but wanted to be unlike the other comments. I, too, hate copyright, but in this case I'd say Trump deserves to lose, just cause he's a cunt, and winning this will do basically nothing for anyone except him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I imagined a red dodgeball on a small brown table. The person was just a thick stick figure and when the ball fell it bounced.

The color and shape I didn't actively choose, they cam be different, but I guess my brain has defaults.

The ball falling and bouncing, however, I had to actively think about, the same way I have to think about texture. I don't have to think about where the ball would stop, or how much it would bounce tho.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've re-read the last paragraph. I'm quite slow, it's 100% sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I know the term you are looking for, but probably the shooters are white Christian nationalists.

Which means they are definitely not political terrorists who are terrorizing .

wtf? Why christians wouldn't be considered terrorists?

 

Transcript: A chess board with only knights

view more: next ›