mindlesscrollyparrot

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Is this supposed to be a point of contention?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

Let's have a trigger warning on that, please.

Cries in Brexit

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

But you say they are coming up with excuses for her. There are no excuses provided there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean like Ukrainians? When Putin just won the election?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As long as the Supreme Court agrees that that is restrictive, sure.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

They are going to spend those 4 years doing everything they can to fix the next election as well. Gerrymandering, voter intimidation, you name it. By all means hide in bed to get over the shock but, if you stay there, you'll need to stay there more than 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

So an EU-backed distro could be the same. Yes, they would fund maintainers, but their own maintainers, not maintainers of upstream distros.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How much of Ubuntu's funding goes to supporting debian? I actually don't know.

I don't, for example, see Ubuntu listed here: https://www.debian.org/partners/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Given how much they have been projecting about vote-rigging, I would say this is very plausible.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well, what better way to embrace FOSS than dismissing the efforts of all the existing distro maintainers? Welcome to the community, guys. Good luck building your cathedral next to the bazaar!

How about they instead work together with the distros and create a way of certifying a distro as gov-ready?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We found the solutions a long time ago - it's just that nobody wanted to implement them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's quite clear that we did.

view more: next ›