johnyma22

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Google ran a huge push to get these into schools too.. There was a LOT of pressure on Schools to adopt from various partners (or at least that happened in the UK)...

Google is aware of the Microsoft gains from getting people used to their products at a young age...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm really confused.. Did you answer my question?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Peace with no occupation would be ideal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Security related issues should go through responsible disclosure and it's up to the maintainer to provide such a process or the recently flurry of "opportunistic whitehats" will continue to spam your issues and require triaging..

Github provides a process for this under the "Security" tab: https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/security as an example..

I find that by having a documented process it filters out a decent amount of time wasters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Best part of Gondwana

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The old 'let perfection be the enemy of good' argument..

Surely this is a step in the right direction?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I guess you gotta celebrate the wins when you can no matter how messed up the situation is! :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I know this isn't the core of the story but I'm kinda proud of my country (The UK) for not fucking this up.

I think the UK Justice system did it's job here, albeit keeping him detained for a lengthy duration to do it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do we all need a competitor to Alphabet/Google? I'd say yes, I don't think Alphabet is behaving fairly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Santander and Caixa are perfect examples of how to terribly handle fraudulent payment disputes. I worked in the industry is it's kinda well known they don't even follow scheme (Visa/MC) requirements and when you ask them to escalate to scheme they gaslight you.

Knowing this is the hoops you have to jump through in .es means it makes sense they don't have a robust anti-fraud process outside of .es.

 

The company is "Freedom Internet" in St. Cruz, Tenerife.

I've posted a review calling them out but they are stating:

  1. What they are doing is entirely legal <-- Source for pre-ticked checkboxes: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/top-european-court-rules-pre-checked-cookie-consent-boxes-invalid -- Source for not having a privacy policy that is referenced in contract: https://gdpr.eu/data-privacy/
  2. That the contract states they only share information with installers so they can provide the service... <-- this is an outright lie as per the privacy policy.

Can anyone tell me if the above is true?

They agreed to remove clause #2 (promotional offers) but said 1 and 3 checkboxes must be kept.

Also, can anyone access their privacy policy? I reported it as being a faulty URL but they state it works..

Notes: Edits for clarity and typos.

view more: next ›