That's not Ross, that's David Schwimmer
jack
Yes but git can be reasonable
Rude? That's a bit much
Thanks for your explanation, that makes sense. Was just curious what your take on this is, since a lot of CEOs made some very irrational decisions in the past like the recent Unity debacle or Reddit killing the community. Sometimes asking "what if" can help understand the situation. Of course with Linux we have all the options in case something bad happens
If you're into scripting anyways you have a lot more power on a Linux system. Windows was never intended for automation
What if Red Hat's CEO changes and the new one for some reason only wants to keep sponsoring Fedora if the direction drastically changes? The FESCo could decide that the continued sponsorship is what's most important for Fedora and now Red Hat could dictate over Fedora.
Hopefully that never happens and it doesn't seem too probable right now, but it's still a thought
I agree. Html could also be compared to a config file. Only parsed; it doesn't provide new instructions (unlike python etc)
Have you tried Linux?
So everything as usual
Lixma balls
Are you complaining that they're going open source?