eugenia

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In that case, if it's just CLI, you don't need a new computer. Use your phone or tablet to ssh inside your main Linux computer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Raspberry Pis are also ARM-based, and you can use them as desktops. Only problems are that they aren't very powerful for media usage (e.g. video editing, 4k video decoding on youtube, blender etc). If you're not into such high performance media production, then sure, they're fine for everyday usage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

You can always provide them with enough standardized APIs that don't break, to make them useful. The situation that's right now is unacceptable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

That's more acceptable than to have them break every 6 months.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

No, there is a third option: you freeze the API for the extensions. That way, nothing breaks. And if an app uses private APIs (or public APIs that are not meant for extensions' use), then and only then you treat it as unsupported.

And yes, the constant breaking is a big, big problem. I use 6 extensions to make the desktop the way I want it to. In every release, I get at least 4 of them breaking for several weeks each time. The last time, the dock extension I used broke with the new Gnome version, but when it got disabled, the "favorite" icons on its dock did not reflect on the Gnome's default dockbar. All that stuff, are unacceptable for a proper usage in 2024, especially for people coming from Windows that expect stability (no matter what people say, Windows IS stable). I use Linux since 1999, but it's that kind of stuff that i can't stand. I want stability. The days when I was hacking on Gentoo in 2003, are long gone. I'm now in my 50s and i don't have time for that shit.

So, yeah, the third option.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 weeks ago (14 children)

I use Gnome, and I'm not a hater, but if you're expecting some harsh criticism for it, here it is: Extensions breaking so easily should not happen. It's an extreme pain in the butt every 6 months. They should establish an allowed API that's frozen, while extensions that use private api calls, don't get posted on the gnome website/extensions app, so they're harder to find. Simple.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The ads have become too long. Some of them are 40 seconds long, for a 3 minute video. That's unacceptable. I have thought about it, and I think the best would have been a single 8 second ad, unskippable. But never more than that. That, I could take. But multiple ads (even if they're just 5 secs each but you have to be vigilant to press "skip"), or long ads, or interrupting ads, are just too much to accept.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

With 32MB of RAM you can't go far. The Linux kernel barely runs on it, and that's just the kernel. NetBSD also has a minimum requirement of 32GB of RAM. One other thing you can do is try to run BeOS (not Haiku, but BeOS). It could run on 32MB of RAM (it still preferred 64 MB, but it could run on 32 too).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're trying a less "smart" phone experience, just buy a dumb phone. They still exist. Phones are needed for emergencies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did. you not read what I wrote? I used it as a media center and it was swapping like hell. That's what Emby and Jellyfin are. Media servers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

3 years ago XFCe needed on Debian about 450 MB of RAM (on a clean boot). It now needs 850. And that's not so much XFce's fault, it's all the other stuff underneath that have been growing too much too.

I mean, heck, Cosmic should not need more than 500 MB of RAM overall, having such a clean codebase. And yet it's the heaviest of them all, at 2.5 GB (even Gnome/KDE boots at 1.3 GB on Debian). And it's not a matter of optimization because it's an alpha. That's a cheap explanation. It's just heavy. Just as much as Windows in terms of ram usage.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Not enough RAM to be honest (at least not to be useful in the near future). I ran an Emby/Jellyfin server with 180 GB of music (nothing else was running, not even the UI), and it ran out of RAM, and was swapping like crazy at 1 GB of RAM on my Rpi3. In this day and age, you need 2 GB of RAM for servers, but that won't be enough within a couple of years (and that's why I don't suggest this new model with 2 GB of RAM). I personally would only get a new Raspberry Pi if it comes with 16 GB of RAM, so I can run a UI properly. You just can't ever have enough RAM these days. Linux is using less RAM than Win11, but not by much these days. It's growing too fast in requirements in the last 3-4 years.

view more: ‹ prev next ›