And they all compete vigorously against one another, behind the scenes!
detalferous
joined 1 year ago
I don't want to have to opt out
If the value proposition for users is so great, then make it opt-in!
The fact that they're not willing to go this far tells you everything you need to know: that it's user hostile.
And equally importantly: not run the software you don't want
I find the experience to be superior to Windows in every way, including driver support. And it gets more and more stark with every version of Windows.
Ten, you say? Is that still supported?.
So he wants to kill 90% of the populace in a geographical region.
How does anyone deny this is genocide?
Hard agree
That's helpful, but why declare a 50% devaluation? Isn't that just determined once you peg to the dollar and float your currency?
Totally agree
Your contributors must attribute copyright or agree to any reason license if you choose this. (This seems so obvious to me that I didn't mention it)
But it's still strictly superior to MIT licensing, which has the same requirement (since that's part of copyright law, not party is the license itself), while still preventing commercial adoption under a different license.
What does he say this achieves? What is his endgame with respect to the devaluation?
A lot of posts are from bots. It would be cool if the bots could make a whole new submission and not link back, but all things considered I'm just happy there is interesting content.
The VLC team are heroes. Three cheers.