dank

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Did you read the article? And if so, was it before or after constructing your straw man?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She already lost. Your liberal tears won't fix anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Jesus, you're full of yourself. Banning someone for nothing more than disagreeing with you. Why don't I just go back to Reddit if this is the moderation we are going to have here?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

My only regret is that I have but one vote to give Jill Stein

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing says chauvinism like saying, "meh, what's a few hundred thousand lives of brown people on the other side of the world to me."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hey buddy, um, your, uh, your chauvinism is hanging out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's just a wiiitle genocide!!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Libs couldn't bother to stop a genocide to stop a fascist

 

The outlet, which describes itself as Pennsylvania’s only African American-owned and operated radio station, also said the White House’s decision to supply questions to Lawful-Sanders prolonged a historical practice of marginalizing and “de-legitimizing Black voices” in US media.

"Lawful-Sanders was one of two battleground state radio hosts who aired an interview with Biden on 4 July and described being given questions by the president’s staff ahead of the conversation."

 

To suspend the number of people who can apply for asylum, Biden is relying on the same mechanism Donald Trump turned to during his presidency: section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

But in the 40 years since the US created its asylum system, no other Democrat suspended people’s ability to seek refuge in the US – an international right. 

Moreover, under the order, people apprehended near the border will have to “manifest” their fear of prosecution if deported, and will not be explicitly asked by immigration officials, as has been the case for decades. This practice, known unofficially as a “shout test”, could turn back those who could still be eligible for protections. 

 

Student editors at the Columbia Law Review say they were pressured by the journal’s board of directors to halt publication of an academic article written by a Palestinian human rights lawyer that accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza and upholding an apartheid regime.

When the editors refused the request and published the piece on Monday morning, the board – composed of faculty and alumni from Columbia University’s law school – shut down the law review’s website entirely. It remained offline on Tuesday evening, a static homepage informing visitors the domain “is under maintenance”.

view more: next ›