circuscritic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I realize the article was written to make it sound like they lost money on this, but I would be shocked if they had.

To vastly oversimplify it, private equity does a few things to make money on the companies they acquire:

  • Significantly reduce staff, and increasing workload
  • Strip and sell off individual assets
  • Load the company with debt

The last parts are where it goes from amoral to "HOW THE FUCK IS THAT LEGAL?"

The private equity firm will have its own separate entities that provide a variety of services, for example janitorial or administrative.

The new private equity owners will then replace all the current vendors, with their own entities at a expentionally hirer costs. All the while, paying themselves gigantic consulting fees.

Basically those are all just ways to legally embezzle money by extracting all the resources from the company. Once that's done, they'll sell the last thing of value: the brand name itself e.g. CNET, VICE, etc.

If there is no money in the brand itself, then they'll just dissolve the company.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's important to note the reason all this kicked off is a Russian boxing organization

That is what I was responding to. Your flippant dismissal of what the IBA actually is: a highly relevant intentional sporting organization for boxing, which is still true despite their current situation.

Shit on them for everything you laid out, their farsical antics this week, blatant corruption, or any other number of issues, but don't intentionally mislead and mischaracterize them to an audience that most likely largely ignorant of amateur boxing or combat sports in general. Or at least, that is assuming as there are no active combat sports communities on Lemmy that I have seen, be it MMA, boxing, kick boxing, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's not a Russian organization, it's the IBA - which is the premier amateur boxing organization/confederation, which is currently headed by a Russian national.

And his time in office has been a smashing success, such as when the IOC withdrew their recognition of the IBA, which removed the IBA from any involvement/participation in Olympic Boxing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well, that wasn't included in the multiple insufferable Riyadh Season marketing and promo packages during last night's fights.

Hmmmm....you know, I'm starting to think that allowing Saudi Arabia to financially take over boxing and layer in their propaganda between every fucking fight on the card isn't such a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What I'm about to say is coming directly from my own asshole, so if someone actually knows what they're talking about cares to explain why I'm wrong, I'm open to hearing it.

This feels like an attempt to try extract as much capital as possible before other civil lawsuits and/or regulatory actions are able to do to the same.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

$849 and $1,649? Those pricetags are so absurd that this post should be removed on principle alone, nevermind that it's stealth marketing masquerading as an article.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're putting your moderators hands on the scale and that far outweighs any community/user input into the validity of information discussed here.

On a completely unrelated note, did you know that Hamas went on a baby beheading spree on Oct. 7?

I know this because I read it on MSN.com, and your MediaBiasFactCheck said that MSN.com has a HIGH FACTUAL RATING

Anyone is free to rip apart my comment, and that source, but that task becomes more difficult when bots that have been anointed as bias and fact checkers, contradict them in any way, or are themselves biased.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Oh, lovely. Ministry of Truth Bots...

This is predicated on the assumption that those organizations are neutral arbitrators of facts, but they aren't.

They might have a better gauge on reality than OAN, or PatriotEagleNews.ru, but that doesn't mean platform moderators should present them as if they are a source of universal truth.

People can be critical of posts, comments, and their sources, without the heavy hand of moderators using a privatized Ministry of Truth.

We don't even have to look very far back to see how platform level "fact checking" systems are used and abused to silence and suppress information that goes against mainstream narratives or is viewed as politically damaging.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Except the majority of the cutting edge R&D is done and/or funded via the public sector.

Their R&D budget priorities are more focused on things like reformulating existing drugs to extend the patents and prevent opening the market to generic manufacturers.

So yes, cheating patent laws and heavily spending on marketing and lobbying campaigns does eat into their profit margins a little bit.

But I'm not sure how that justifies their unparalleled track record of pathologically sadistic business practices, such as the one highlighted in this article.

Do you have a graph or chart for that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you fucking stupid?

Do you seriously think that the DoD forgot to include the line item for radar absorbing hentai plane art?

JFC get with the times.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Zip drive.

But I'm getting ready for their NGD program (Next Gen Disk), and buying up all Jaz drives and disks left on eBay.

In 50 years when they release the next RFP, I'll be a lock.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

....why does Lemmy's noncredible insist on being lesscredible, or even credible?

But thanks for the write up and graphics to show me why WWII era naval torpedoes weren't actually mounted on those hard points lol.

view more: ‹ prev next ›