If the word triggers some symptom, then why would that same word, "hidden" by a trick that wouldn't faze a six-year-old, be any less harmful?
amio
This is an outrage.
I have absolutely no idea. "So how have you been doing since ruining my life? IV drug abuse? That's awesome, man, heard about that one through the grapevine and it gave me some... well, not joy, of course, but definitely a bit of grim satisfaction. Maybe there's something to this karma thing after all, eh?"
Well, at least people were saved from terrible tra*ma by cl*verly h*ding the "u" in "ab*sive". Can't tell that's what it says at all...
Sure. They're so "far left" (Marxist-Leninist, allegedly) they're all the way up an unrepentant, fascistic, oligarchic, autocratic, right wing dictator's asshole. Presumably the "logic" is that at least Russia used to be communist, and isn't "amerikkka" (staggeringly witty stuff, huh?), but it's pretty clear they're just trolls - or nearly undistinguishable from trolls. That is not effort I'd recommend wasting on their dumb asses.
Speaking as a mildly militant atheist, this is some of the smartest shit I've ever seen a religious adherent say.
They definitely have some of the ideas of all time. The purported real ones, anyway, I'm sure.
... wow. Best of luck with that.
SQLite for almost everything I've ever done that wasn't professional. In those cases it's "whatever the project already uses, or else postgres".
As long as it isn't a shoehorned-in freaking document database that's being used on relational data.
I'm not sure it's a specifically named one, but then again there are dozens, and they're hard to keep straight. In general it is (attempted) rationalization, hand-waving, and kinda... just a bad argument. It does not actually explain why that specific murder was "necessary" - only that it could've been.
The intent is to rationalize, but it might not get close enough to a real argument to pin down to a specific (in)formal fallacy.
I'm seeing a lot of uncited claims. If these are just conjecture or opinion you could be clearer on it. If they're not, citing sources is probably a good idea.