amio

Those aren't necessarily impurities in the nasty sense, just mineral content.

Damn, this is pretty accurate to my views too, just... phrased better.

It's not even a good idea to let quite a lot of adults use ChatGPT. People don't know how it works, don't treat the answers with anything close to appropriate skepticism, and often ask about things they don't have the knowledge/skills to verify. And anything it tells you, you likely will need to verify.

It's quite unlikely to affect their personality, but it might make them believe a bunch of weird shit that some unknowable, undebuggable computer program hallucinated up. If you've done an uncommonly great job with their critical thinking skills, great. If not, better get started. That is not specific to "AI" though.

something out of context

Yes. This place is relentlessly negative, and I'm no sunny optimist myself.

I aggressively block communities and on some occasions, people who are obvious agenda pushers. It takes a mildly annoying amount of work to clear away the mess and keep it cleared, but it can be done. It's okay to block shit.

yadda yadda didn't read :)

Rekt

... but no, no, I'm sure the ban was due to the relationship advice. 8)

A stupid dipshit of an "influencer" or whatever. That is as much as I ever need to know about the guy.
(Apparently I have been conflating him with his brother, which would normally be a mistake but... seems fine, actually.)

House is not canonically autistic as far as I know. Of course, in TV writing, autism tends to be sloppily coded as "being an asshole" instead, and he definitely is that in spades. He does seem to slightly play into it in one random episode, and his boss says something along the lines of "you don't even have Asperger's!" The only unambiguous autist on House that I remember is the kid from that same episode, who is nonverbal and melts down over the slightest thing. As far as representation goes, that's fairly narrow and not all that positive.

I watched The Good Doctor for about two and a half seasons. Eventually it started grinding my gears because it keeps being the exact same conflict over and over. (Ironic given I watched House, I know. Multiple times. Still.)
While whatshisface might be understandably "stuck", all those highly trained medical professionals and romantic interests around him should probably eventually have gotten a clue about that whole autism thing. As representation goes this guy is also relatively out there, and plays up a lot of stereotypes that don't seem entirely positive.
I do think the pandering/romanticization is kinda obvious in this, though: it plays up Super-Autist ideas, and makes sure there's no shortage of pretty girls around - who tend seem rather more into autistic guys than I daresay seems likely in real life, for some reason.

BBT I found mildly clever for like 5 whole seconds at the very start of episode 1. I don't know why I watched a few seasons further.
I dislike Sheldon's character. He is the archetype of the lazily written Hollywood "autist/smart guy/douchebag" pigeonhole, heavily playing into truckloads of strictly negative stereotypes about autists, smart people, geeks etc. and any combination. You know he's smart because he has the whiteboard with Physics on it, and because he's an asshole - one of very few ways TV writing tries to show intelligence at all.
Now I might seem butthurt - that would be because I started out with actual expectations of a "smart, geek-friendly" comedy show. Eventually I got more a bait&switch "cringe comedy" feeling (a genre I hate) with a superficially "geeky" paintjob.
Seems a bit pandery to me, mostly along the lines of antiintellectualism and "anti geek sentiment".

That makes sense. For some reason, I thought it was something like "no reason to do what I did". So basically "Sure, totally no ulterior motives here, by the way!", which seemed kinda weird to me.

"Ah, {countryName} switched out their authoritarian ruler for someone who thought FNV's Caesar's Legion were a pretty cool bunch."