addictedtochaos

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, romans began to use soap at roughly year zero. I wonder why. I wonder why people use deodorant every day, when they just can spray water under their arms.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

thanks, thats certainly a good read! I wonder though why clinics don't have soap bars; maybe thats not true, but is it not general knowledge that soap bars spread germs?

ah, you answered that as well, sorry. thanks!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

yeah, seeing it from that side, I agree. you are right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

no and yes to that; there are tall people and small people, but that is usually not a medical condition.

everyone is built the same. and certainly nobody is built to have life detrimental skin conditions; yes, severe gene defects exist. But if you are swaetting a lot and you stink like a skunk, there is a very good reason for it. and the reason is:

something is hindering homöostasis to work properly- and that is usually a thing you ingested but don't need, or a thing you did not ingest, but need. plus toxin exposure.

what do I mean by that?

Biochemistry works the same for everybody. it does not change to do something different, ever. Hormones are biochemistry.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

thats worng, you describe disinfectants, soap breaks the fatty bonds that stick the bacteria to your skin. so, while you whash your hands, these alive bactera are whashed down the drain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the question is: are they sick and thus the skin is out of whack, or are they sick because the skin is out of whack?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

now try doing that with hair. or your hands after vivisecting a corpse, and then delivering a baby. clean up feces and vomit, and then try to get rid of the smell without soap.

every farm worker that works with life stock knows what i am talking about. ever worked on an engine, then tried to clean your hands with water or oliveoil?

I guess the oil has merits, since certain oils DO have detergent properties.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe7275

But if you’re looking to have your mind blown, take a shower and just scrub your skin with a brush, loofah or the palm of your hand and be amazed when you still get clean. If you’re really grimey, you can do what the Romans did and rub yourself with olive oil and scrape it off with a scraper before doing that.

I will try that, thanks.

You are right about one thing: if you are healthy, the skin will provide everything it needs to take care of itself. you ever wondered why kids don't stink, have easy to wipe bottoms, and don't need to wash their hair every day, and what have you? its because they are not yet broken like adults are. yes, it is also the hormones; but if you have an adult that really stinks up the place after taking a shover, chances are that their metabolism is out of whack; the skin is full of microorganisms, and they have a kind of balanced relation ship with the skin. if this gets thrown, certain microorganisms will overtake the others, and produce smells like crazy.

As such, we had ways of dealing with that well before we had soap and people didn’t just immediately switch.

That logic is hard to dismiss, that is sure interesting. you are absolutely right. I wonder what they did.

Early soaps were used for the preparation of textiles rather than personal hygiene.

I guess they used it to clean absolutely everything. because soap loosens up fatty bonds. thats why using disinfectant does not get rid of the dead bacteria; they are still on your hands, albeit dead. soap does not kill most of germs, but thy are unable to cling to the skin.

I was in poor regions of africa multiple times; the poorest of the poor would use soap when they could. people are poor, but not stupid. if what you said would work, they would do it, but they buy soap instead.

wikipedia:

Roman Empire

Pliny the Elder, whose writings chronicle life in the first century AD, describes soap as "an invention of the Gauls".[22] The word sapo, Latin for soap, likely was borrowed from an early Germanic language and is cognate with Latin sebum, "tallow". It first appears in Pliny the Elder's account,[23] Historia Naturalis, which discusses the manufacture of soap from tallow and ashes. There he mentions its use in the treatment of scrofulous sores, as well as among the Gauls as a dye to redden hair which the men in Germania were more likely to use than women.[24][25] The Romans avoided washing with harsh soaps before encountering the milder soaps used by the Gauls around 58 BC.[26] Aretaeus of Cappadocia, writing in the 2nd century AD, observes among "Celts, which are men called Gauls, those alkaline substances that are made into balls [...] called soap".[27] The Romans' preferred method of cleaning the body was to massage oil into the skin and then scrape away both the oil and any dirt with a strigil.[28] The standard design is a curved blade with a handle, all of which is made of metal.[29]

The 2nd-century AD physician Galen describes soap-making using lye and prescribes washing to carry away impurities from the body and clothes. The use of soap for personal cleanliness became increasingly common in this period. According to Galen, the best soaps were Germanic, and soaps from Gaul were second best. Zosimos of Panopolis, circa 300 AD, describes soap and soapmaking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

many oduors subside once you get rid of candida and bacteria. I had smelly sweaty feet, lost 30 kilos, feet dry and no smell anymoe, i am so happy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

so does water with high hydrogencarbonate.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

so thats why soap is one of the oldest chemical inventions : because you dont actually need it. pure luxury.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

has to be old bud spencer and terrence hill movies, pretty popular in germany. I know there is a couple of them, but they are all pretty much the same anyway. ;-)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yeah, you are right. seems you know whats up.

 

Ich hatte zwei Probleme:

  1. unheimlich breite zehen
  2. schweißfüße

so, schweißfuss hat sich erledigt, seitdem ich abgenommen habe. aber der punkt ist, dies ist ein luftiger schuh ohne gore tex.

gore tex fühlt sich für mich eher so an, als hätte ich eine plastiktüte im schuh. bei jacken genauso .

der zweite punkt ist, dies ist ein schuh mit gigantisch großer zehenbox, größer als meindl comfort.

er hält auch besser als meindl comfort. bei weitem. ich hab zwei paar meindl comfort zerschlissen. der bär schuh hat nix, trotz wald und autoreparaturen.

der schuh kann neu besohlt werden, wobei das bär nur zweimal macht.

bei meindl comfort hatte ich größe 44,5. bei dem schuh ist meine größe plötzlich 42,5.

dies war so, weil meine schuhe länger sein mußten, damit meine zehen nicht zusammengequetscht wurden.

es sind die bestens schuhe, die ich je hatte. sehr luftig. ich kann sie im winter und im sommer anziehen, wobei ich im winter stulpen benutze.

sie trocknen während man sie am fuß hat, zumindest ist das so, wenn ich fahrrad fahre.

beachtet daß sie vorne wirklich sehr breit sind. der schuh taugt nur für verzweifelte leute.

der schuh ist eine mischung aus freizeit und wanderschuh. er hat keine schmerzhaft drückende zehenkappe, was für mich auch immer ein problem war. so hartgummi über dem großen zeh brauche ich nicht, tut nur weh und man schwitzt viel mehr.

ps:

Die Schnürsenkel vom vorgestellten modell sind absolute Grütze. Wenn sie nass sind, gehen sie nicht mehr auf.

view more: next ›