a1studmuffin

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Is it? I skimmed the GitHub source code and couldn't see anything involving encryption, but it's totally possible I missed something. Perhaps just accessing the database from python is enough to decrypt it.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Wow, it's pretty wild they didn't even attempt to encrypt or protect this data, even if it is local to your machine. What a treasure trove for malware to sift through.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You have to chuckle at the 13% of humans who took the time to write in against a human rights act.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Ok I'll admit, the first thought that went through my head:

100 tonnes of gold! That must weigh a lot!

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (3 children)

A new deal is being forged with 4chan instead.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The author had so many things to highlight that they didn't even mention "as of August 2024" being in the future, haha.

What a trainwreck. The fact it's giving anonymous Reddit comments and The Onion articles equal consideration with other sites is hilarious. If they're going to keep this, they need it to cite its sources at a bare minimum. Can't wait for this AI investor hype to die down.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And imagine being the guy who's got to clean out the train car afterwards of all the tiny pieces. Nightmare fuel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Stop the boats (please)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I did some more research after your comment and it does indeed sound like it's not for the feint of heart.

Spam seems to be one of the biggest challenges, both incoming and outgoing. For incoming, it's a constant arms race with spammers to circumvent spam filtering techniques. But at least that's something you have control over, you can just turn off your spam filtering and ensure you receive all important email. The real problem is ending up in other people's spam filters, which you have very little control over once you've decided on your mail server domain/certificate.

The crux of the issue seems to be that SMTP is ancient insecure tech designed for an innocent era when email was for universities only. We desperately need a more secure open source email protocol designed for the modern era, but capitalism isn't having it - instead we've got corporations wrestling for control of the next big thing with proprietary protocols... Discord, Slack etc. And big tech companies that continue using SMTP (Gmail, Outlook etc.) simply treat any servers outside their sphere with a high level of suspicion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Has anyone tried self-hosting on a NAS or similar? I'd be interested to hear the practicalities of it, I imagine it's not exactly set or forget, and the realities of the enshittified internet present some obstacles, like ending up in spam filters etc.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Responding to eSafety's roadmap last year, the government set a few tests that any age verification scheme would have to meet. They included confidence it can't be circumvented, can be easily applied to companies based abroad, and don't risk the privacy of adults looking to legally access porn.

This is going absolutely nowhere then. All three of those bullet points are impossible problems on their own. What a waste of money.

view more: ‹ prev next ›