Zip2

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it was even better than that. It wasn’t just the tax on the costume, it was the entire cost of them could be deducted from their tax bill. The more extravagant and expensive, the smaller that years tax bill!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think it’s a case of the outfits essentially being akin to a work uniform. You wouldn’t wear it on the street, and you need it for work (as I guess stage and screen actors do too), and due to that you can claim it as a work expense and is tax deductible?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Why didn’t they just adopt the standard Norfolk time zone of -40 years?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

And we’ll stop doing it when the Americans catch up. It’s for their own good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Arguable. I’d say it’s the same but the size of the pieces varies.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Rapid unscheduled disassembly.

Plus “Into pieces” is rather unnecessary there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah but it’s where the real magic happens and the company would fall about without them because they’re irreplaceable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

So? It’s not yours you greedy fucker.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Capitalist engineer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Is that like the new ThinkPad?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are they trying not to attract sandworms?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Couldn’t really say.

view more: ‹ prev next ›