TruthAintEasy

I feel attacked

Dad jokes have no right to be this good

I know, my point is ultimately that your looking at it wrong. The hardware doesnt need to be involved in any special hidden way for any entity to create a profile about you. Also, are you working on top secret tech or something? Why would you consider yourself worth spying on? This isnt an insult, you genuinly seem concerned to me, I hope you can find the answers you seek

Well here is my take: there are only like, 35 personalities that exist in the world with slight individual variations. You posting this tells any data scraper which one you fall under. People are in general extremely predictable. So once the algo has sorted you, they dont have to actively listen to you at all. The algo already knows what choices you perceive yourself as having in your life and when you are likely to make those decisions

Heck, the utility company knows if your going through a divorce based on changes in when and how the bill is paid.

Google knows if your getting laid based off location data

If you dont want to be spied on there is only one way my friend. Only lurk the web from one place, never post, only lurk. And just leave your phone in the closet or wherever when your not using it, turned off. The algo's et al will still draw conclusions from this, but at least they will be incorrect

Gun scare people. Scared people with guns fire more bullets. More gunfire scares more people, causing them to buy guns for protection. Now those additional scared people with guns use them, bringing that same fear they feel to more of their neighbours, who respond by buying guns to protect themselves...

If you really want an armed populace just make it mandatory for all citizens to complete 1 year of military service, with the people retaining their service arms at home. This way everyone is trained the same way and follows the same standards with their weapons. This takes the 'cool' factor out of owning guns, takes the identity politics out of it, and the criminals will now know that they likely cannot gain the advantage in fire power just by getting a high capacity magazine.

It would also calm the cops down, because the year of manditory service will weed out all the crazies that cant handle the responsibility of gun ownership, and since everyone went to the same program you have an automatic national database of who isnt fit for ownership. Give mental health proffessionals the ability to flag on the database when an idividual is having issues so their weapons can be TEMPORARILY removed untill their mental health is restored.

The 2a guys will also lose their main talking point: government is the one giving them the gun now, they would look stupid REEEing about 'gubberment wants muh guns!!'

It seems like the USA will never say no to guns, so why not go full ham instead of just letting every state make up its own rules as it goes along? The current system has some very obvious flaws. Freedom should not be free, it should require responsibiliy, the proof is in the never ending american gun tragedy.

Edit: accidentally tripple posted, still learning the UI... deleted the two duplicates, and fixed some bad grammar

Better than how my city handles a merge lane... they just stop, full on stop on both the merge lane AND the left lane, if they are feeling spicey the passing lane might come to a stop too because... reasons? Best of all is when they are slowing right down to merge in light traffic but they see you coming up the left lane so they take the lane immediately and just, not speed up.

I figure since our digestive system is a hole going right down the middle of our bodies that we are wrapped around, humans are technically doughnut shaped therefore grains also count as human embryo's, lock them farmers up! /s

Do you mind if I ask how you percieve my username?

I seriously internally debated not using the word truth as neo-cons have tainted it but then I thought, no, if I back away from the word truth just because some people miss use it then thats just letting the baddies win.

But the truth is complicated, and often disturbing, hardly ever as simple as "orange man bad" or " Biden old". Even though both statements are 'true' neither one actually conveighs any usefull information or nuance. Orange man is also old, Biden also did some bad stuff (who hasnt?) So both statements are true in the simplified context, but in the context of making an informed decision as a voter both statements are so simple and frankly so dumb that they become invalid. Does that mean the statements are true in one context but false in a different context?

Punch the body untill he is gassed, then go for the jaw, not the cheek, not the eye. Jaw always moves more when hit, reducing the damage to your hands. Well, thats how grandpa explained bareknuckle to me

Ah, I figured two other guys play chess, and when one takes a piece his fighter gets to do an attack. I play to much RPG