Out of curiosity towards your moral model, as you seem comfortable with person A killing person B because person B doesn't give you the rights that you want to have. Does that mean that you would be fine if someone killed you because you don't grant Palestinians the right to live? Just wondering.
Summary:
Tech bro billionaire thinks no one knows what the impact of ai will be on the market but also that the impact will be huge for employees and that everyone should learn ai.
Conclusion: Tech bro billionaire invested in ai and has realized that there is barely any real money to be made as of right now, to cope with his apparent bad judgement, he doubles down on the idea that ai soon be worth it. To continue his plan, he needs more funding and he doesn't want to double down hard enough to do it all himself. So to find new investors, he sings the praise of ai and promises a great future, as the present looks... Well... Bad.
These posts are motivating
I want to help you understand the situation and why people say what they say. Then you can better judge the situation for yourself and make your own decisions.
Situation "your own house": You want to buy a house but you don't have the money because... Wtf is the housing market??? 100k for a cardboard box??? So you lent money from your bank to pay for the house. With interest, you pay maybe e.g. 70% more than what you lent. And it takes you 30 years to do so. You might lose your job and have to save a little extra to cover those times and maybe the bank let's you miss a payment once. After 30 years, you have now a house that needs some repairs but you got more money in your wallet because you are done paying the bank. So you do some repairs and it cost you money, maybe you need a small loan again. Eventually, you are retired and you have less money but you don't have to repair your house anymore. Sure, there are some issues but the heater will manage another 10 years. You don't have to worry too much because you don't have to maintain it after your death. You don't need to save for a new roof in 5 years when you are 95yo. You can make the call that you don't care.
So in other words, you pay a little less than 70% more than the value of the house and afterwards you paid for YOUR UTILITY. Every repair was between you and future you.
Situation "I rent to you": I am buying the house and of course, I am lent the money as it is financially easier and in some places, gives me tax cuts. I buy a house and I too pay 70% interest on it. I need to get the money to pay for my loan. I am not a asshole but also not a saint. So what is pretty fair? Mhm... You, as my renter, pay my loan back! If i ask less, I am literally losing money. But wait, you might move out at any time and I need to pay my loan, so I am asking a little extra... Just in case. But then there are repairs and someone needs to pay for those, so maybe a little extra. Okay now, you are paying for everything! I am safe and sound. After 30 years, you paid back my loan and I own the place. I am getting old and I let my son take care of the business. He takes good care of the house and makes sure that all the repairs are done. He is earning so extra money too as well the loan is paid back. He is looking for a new house for all his children and a big nice garden. With his day job and your rent, his bank gives him a big amount of money that he spends on a beautiful house, he gets the house as he has the cash. You are getting older and you retire, but your rent is not going down. If you could have bought the house 50 years ago, it would have been yours, but it isn't and you are paying the new loan of my son. The heater could use a replacement in the next 10 years but you really don't have the money for that but it isn't your decision, my son wants to rent out the house another 50years if possible. My son feels forced to look for a new renter as you don't have the money to pay for the new loan and the repairs. He kicks you out. You are homeless. You pay off the loan and some of another loan but you are homeless.
Now that story wasn't even about actively trying to make money but not wanting to take a risk for someone else.
Most landlords want to make some money.
Honestly I don't get the OF hate in general. We all have watched porn and we probably liked at least some of what we have seen. What is wrong about earning a living with producing what other people want and like? And as I don't think, we argue about people consuming porn but about paying for it, what the fuck is wrong with paying the content creator? Why do we prefer paying agencies with ad revenue while the agency effectively scams their talent? Why no ads but cash? Why agency and not talent?
Understandable and same. I just see the why. I don't like it either.
I thought the same thing but honestly I understand them from a uninformed casual observer perspective.
American politics are very contrarian.
Technically 0% of their problems and 100% of their former problems.
That is the good kind of conditional love; condition is "love yourself and work towards a better tomorrow"
If this was a joke, I love the joke
Privatized networks are a crime and it should be treated legally as such.
Public network for the public.