Tagger

They're organised this time

Forget a consultant, I'll help them with that.

Yeah, but ranked choice isn't in operation, so you've got to make the better choice for right now.

Also, in that case Trump would be the better option. I would hope that in a scenario where the republicans had nominated Hitler that the democrats could do better than Trump but if they couldn't, then yes, voting for Trump in that scenario would be r the right thing to do as voting for, say, Bernie Sanders I. that scenario would let, you know, Hitler become the President.

Yeah, but then, if, say 20% of voters in swing states voted third party, it would let the greater evil in, this being the very immoral choice.

Surely a more relevant measure is what can I do that will do the most good. Voting for someone who is better than the other realistic option, this keeping extremists out of power feels like a more moral option than making a pointless vote.

thanks, it's always nice to see both sides of some data

Can I see the same information under Trump?

Please list the country when using place names. I thought this was talking about Odessa, Ukraine and was surprised.

If I'd known it was the backwater we call the USA I'd have expected it.

This was my thinking

Is this Birmingham, Alabama or Birmingham, UK, though?

Do you remember how much the media talked about Biden's age. Weird they don't look at doddery, confused Donald in the same way. This hopes to put that back on the agenda.

Also, people tend not to want to vote for one person only for another person to end up doing the job, especially not some (alleged but not denied) couch fucker

She went to the employment court to sue them over her dismissal

thanks