SevenOfWine

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you think the FSB had good intel, that means you think they decided to ignore it and allow the terrorist attack in Moscow to happen.

I don't think they're that evil. But hey, maybe you're right.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Those Ukrainian Jewish Nazi ISIS supporters! They're the worst!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Shoddy intel which was better than what the FSB had on offer.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Shame that the FSB doesn't have better intel on what's happening in Russia than the CIA.

Perhaps they were too busy tracking the gays after Russia recently labelled the LGBT+ movement terrorists. Perhaps they were tired after ensuring Putin won a sufficient margin against the communists. Or maybe some kid posted a meme on tiktok and they got distracted.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago

You misunderstand how Russian propaganda works.

It's this:

The firehose of falsehood is a propaganda technique in which a large number of messages are broadcast rapidly, repetitively, and continuously over multiple channels (such as news and social media) without regard for truth or consistency. An outgrowth of Soviet propaganda techniques, the firehose of falsehood is a contemporary model for Russian propaganda under Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood

The Jewish Nazis in Ukraine funded ISIS! The CIA funded the ISIS attack! The CIA didn't warn us! The CIA didn't warn us in time! This was done by ISIS! This was done by Ukraine! The attackers were fleeing to Ukraine! They were fleeing to Belarus but we stopped them! We are war with NATO! We are not at war with NATO. If NATO gives Ukraine F16s Russia will be at war with NATO. If NATO gives Ukraine F16s, Russia will shoot them down, but not be at war with NATO!

Etc. etc. etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Never attribute to malice, that which can easily be explained by incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ask them the pin code or credit card number.

When they refuse to give it, reply "So you do have something to hide."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

I actually enjoy that sentence, because you can ask them for the pin code of their bank card.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Interesting reading the mod log and seeing what got your comment removed and you banned.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Here's what I found:

Over the past year, numerous dissidents across Russia have found their Telegram accounts seemingly monitored or compromised. Hundreds have had their Telegram activity wielded against them in criminal cases. Perhaps most disturbingly, some activists have found their “secret chats”—Telegram’s purportedly ironclad, end-to-end encrypted feature—behaving strangely, in ways that suggest an unwelcome third party might be eavesdropping. These cases have set off a swirl of conspiracy theories, paranoia, and speculation among dissidents, whose trust in Telegram has plummeted. In many cases, it’s impossible to tell what’s really happening to people’s accounts—whether spyware or Kremlin informants have been used to break in, through no particular fault of the company; whether Telegram really is cooperating with Moscow; or whether it’s such an inherently unsafe platform that the latter is merely what appears to be going on. ... Elies Campo, who says he directed Telegram’s growth, business, and partnerships for several years, confirmed this general characterization to WIRED, as did a former Telegram developer. In other words, Telegram has the capacity to share nearly any confidential information a government requests. Users just have to trust that it won’t.

https://www.wired.com/story/the-kremlin-has-entered-the-chat/

view more: next ›